Assignment #1 Questions

Posted on Sunday, February 21st, 2016 at 11:56 am
Q: I am confused about how you want this assignment delivered. Are we supposed to send three separate emails? One for the demand letter, one to Mesa, and a final billing letter?
 
A: What I would prefer is if you put all three of these documents into one file and submit it either as one Word file or one PDF. If you have trouble figuring out how to do that, contact my secretary (sconti@buffalo.edu).
Q: I am a little confused about the statutory period. The statute says “a person must bring suit not later than 8 years after the day the cause of action accrues to recover real property held in peaceable and adverse possession by another who cultivates, uses, or enjoys the property.” The HVAC system has been on the land for 10 years while it was under ownership of Idelwood. Our client bought the land 6 weeks ago. I am having trouble finding an explanation in the book about whether the statutory period accrues at the time the HVAC was placed (10 years ago) or when it was discovered by our clients (6 weeks ago). The book sheds light on the discovery rule for chattels, but not real property. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
A: Sad to say that I won’t help you with this one. You need to try an interpret what the statute means without my help and apply it to your facts.

Q: In the workbook, when it says that Monarch Manufacturing Company paid cash for the property but did not pay for title insurance, does that mean they have title to the land? I assume they received title to the land once they paid for it, but I just want to make sure.

A: Yes. They have title (a piece of paper saying they own the land). They didn’t do title insurance. You can decide whether that information affects your analysis or not

Q: Are we ignoring the part of the assignment in the workbook that says to discuss trespass, as your assignment points only to Adverse Possession [assuming that trespass is inherent in Adverse Possession?]?.

A: I want to answer this in a timely fashion but don’t actually have the workbook in front of me. Follow the instructions as described in the workbook expect as modified by the assignment write up I gave you.

Q: Does concurrent ownership exempts the exclusive possession element in the majority of jurisdictions or just in New York?

A: I am not going to answer that question for you. If you think it is important to figure out, you may consult outside sources like Powell’s on Property or talk to a research librarian for help.

 

Q: If 2 elements of AP are missing, can we leave our analysis there since one must possess all the elements of adverse possession through the statutory period?

A: You should explain all the elements and evaluate each of them.

 

Q: Which jurisdiction are we in for assignment one?

A: It is a fictional jurisdiction. That is why you are given the state statute and told that the jurisdiction follows the majority common law rules. If you feel the need to name the state, you can call it Obrian

 

Q: What email address do we use for the email to Mesa?

A: Doesn’t matter. mesa@monarch.com seems fine.

 

Q: I just wanted to confirm that I understand the instructions correctly. You want us to explain the adverse possession rule by using cases that are either from the textbook or from our own research. Then you want us to analogize or distinguish those cases to/from our case. Is this correct?

A: Yes. You are in a jurisdiction that follows the majority common law rules (plus the statute provided). Using the textbook you should be able to describe the elements of adverse possession and analyze each of them have been met in this situation. Case law may be helpful to explain elements or help illustrate why some of the elements may or may not be met. Outside research is allowed and encouraged, but you should be able to complete the assignment based on the reading we have done.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.